Mike Go use the Imacon at Calumet in Drummond Street, NW1. You can rent it by the hour. I would be interested in what you think.... Steve > From: "Nunan, Mike" <mike.nunan@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:12:30 +0100 > To: "'DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com'" > <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Film Scanners > > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for that. In the end, I actually bypassed everything and did raw scans, > which I then inverted in Photoshop to eliminate any possibility of the scan > software (either VueScan or DiMAGE Scan) interfering with things. They still > looked hard compared to the LS-30, and very hard put next to the creamy (but > soft) output I got from the Epson Perfection 3200. I do take your point about > the grain looking more prominent when the contrast is high -- I noticed that > if I used curves to make the 5400 scans match the Epson scans, the grain would > calm down a great deal too. I have also had good results with Neat Image. > Ultimately, all these things are workarounds however. What I'd really like is > a scanner with the smooth, low-contrast tonality of the Epson flatbed, and the > resolving power of the Minolta. Maybe one day! > > Best, > > -= mike =- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Staver [mailto:daniel@...] > Sent: 19 October 2004 12:32 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Film Scanners > > > Make sure you set the highlight and shadow values very low in Vuescan, > otherwise the contrast will be hard. When I had the Minolta I would use > 0.0001 for both values and 'White balance' for the color mode. My scans would > come out very flat, retaining all detail in shadows and highlights. Then I > could increase the contrast in Photoshop with the curve tools to my liking. > > As for grain I haven't noticed that big a difference in how different scanner > models will scan grain. My two previous scanners were the Canon FS4000US and > the Minolta 5400, and now I have a Microtek Artixscan 120tf. The grain from > all of them looks very similar - assuming I adjust the contrast in the images > from the different scanners to match as closely as possible. > > Contrast will always make a big impact in how you see the grain, so it's > important not to compare a contrasty image from one scanner to a flat image > from another, as the former will always look more grainy than the latter. > > Edge to edge sharpness is an issue with the Minolta 5400 though. It can be > difficult to get sharp scans if the film is even a little bit curved. > Actually this appears to be a problem with most film scanners and I would > recommed getting one that supports a glass holder to keep the film perfectly > flat. This will also allow you to play with fluid mounting which can be a good > way to smooth out the grain structure in many films. > > I've found that the latest versions of Neatimage has become very good at > reducing grain in high resolution film scans. Of course, if you use too much > noise reduction the image will look artificial and plasticky, but if you're > conservative you get to keep the grain structure of the film while reducing it > to less objectionable amounts. Noise reduction values of 20-30% seems good for > 4000dpi film scans of 400iso BW films. > > This can also be a good way to counter grain enhancing effects when sharpening > an image. If you reduce noise first and then sharpen you end up with a much > less grainy image than if you just sharpen directly, which can easily increase > the grain to unacceptable amounts. > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no > >> Thanks for the suggestion, but I have already given it a go, and I >> still see similar results. I'm pretty much convinced it's the light >> source. As I mentioned, it's possible to correct matters somewhat >> using curves, but that can have a deleterious effect on image >> quality. I think the "problem" is with the raw data coming off the >> sensor, not in the post-processing. I'm not trying to suggest that >> B&W shooters should avoid this scanner, just that it's worth checking >> out some scans before putting your money down, as it may not provide >> you with the results you want. > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================== > This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received > this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was > misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB > retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network. > Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they > are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure. > ============================================================================== > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See „Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines‰ in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE „OWNER‰ AND > „MODERATORS‰ OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE „OWNER‰ AND „MODERATORS‰ OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Film Scanners
2004-10-19 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.