Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: LCD vs. CRT

2004-11-03 by Steve Kale

What do you expect for $300?  Buy quality.


> From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 06:43:02 +0100
> To: "sdmey4@..." <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: LCD vs. CRT
> 
> 
> sdmey4@... writes:
> 
>> ZERO defective pixels, If I recall anything over 3 was a returnable display.
> 
> I'm still waiting for manufacturers to commit to zero defective pixels.
> Three defective pixels is not acceptable on a display, especially given
> the price of most flat-panel displays.
> 
> One of the two $300 LCD displays I have has a dead pixel.  The other one
> originally had a dead pixel, but it went away.  I don't use them for
> critical work, but for an expensive, critical display, I want a
> commitment to zero defective pixels.  I know it can be done, so no
> excuse is acceptable.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.