Yes, it was BO. I should have said that. josh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Douglas Meeuwsen <lipshurt@m...> wrote: > that looks to me like BO on a 1280. If you used quad UT2 that would be > about perfect. If it is BO, that is exactly my beef with black only. > So, It seems like lots of people are ignoring an elephant in the middle > of the room when it comes to BO on a 1280. People talk like it is a > viable thing to have a 1280 for color and Mono using BO. I dont think > so. Of course, all this is "if" that swatch is done black only! that > swatch looks exactly like my 1280 in BO, and other BO prints I have > seen. And it does not good enough. If you show that to some guy who > doesnt have any interest in printing or photography, he will " you must > have a good printer".....if you show a UT2 print, he will say "where > did you get that developed?".....those two comments are not > equal......I'm just a beginner, but I have heard those comments when > show freinds my prints....Doug M > On Nov 6, 2004, at 10:23 AM, josh_wertheimer wrote: > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 1280 banding.
2004-11-06 by josh_wertheimer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.