Hello Bruce, ** (My earlier post was sent accidentally before it was done, sorry) >prints using this curve lacked realism though they successfully >displayed all the tones in the photograph. >A compromise needs to be made that only the skilled eye of a >printmaker can shape for most pleasing results. I think you have put your finger on the thing that I was intuitively feeling but couldn't articulate. I have also been following this discussion with a lot of interest, but while the theories make sense I still couldn't quite see the practical application and have had an uneasy sense about it. I have never really understood the technicalities of what we're doing (the gamma-this and log-that just makes my eyes glaze over), so my own pathfinding has been a mostly intuitive process based on years of darkroom experience. >The monitor can be changed to match the print, but not the other >way around. This is exactly what I eventually arrived at (but from a non-technical approach), hence my workflow practice of setting the printer profile to "Same As Source" and choosing a document space profile to get best WYSIWYG. I'm not saying the theories aren't correct, but I think there is a whole lot more happening and a pure technical approach will fall short somehow. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re:tonal range
2004-12-05 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.