Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield 
<scho@m...> wrote:
> Steven,
> 
> I agree that the 4x5 should do better than what I obtained in this 
> comparison.  Although, I'm surprised by your comments on the 
Fujinon 
> 240 A quality.  I purchased this lens based on the rave reviews in 
the 
> largeformat photography forum and on Kerry Thalman's web site.  
Mine 
> seems to have about the same level of sharpness as my Rodenstock 
> Sironar-S 135mm f/5.6, which is the only other lens I have for the 
4x5. 

Carl;

I've never been able to get particularly sharp images out of mine; 
Perhaps I should have it checked? It seems adequate for 4x5, but I 
use all my lenses on both 4x5 and 2x3 (common lensboards) and it 
just won't hold up for 2x3. One of these days I'll probably sell it 
on ebay, so I'm happy to hear it has a good reputation!

BTW-nice photo either way, though I think I prefer the longer-
exposure water-blur.

Steve