On Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 10:14 AM, antonisphoto@... wrote: > can you tell us more about the real world performance with negs. > How do plugged up highlight areas (darkest on the neg) scan in terms of > detail and noise? I'm very happy with it so far -- a week into owning it. I'd previously used a UMAX PowerLook II (nearly three years old), and the Epson is *far* better with highlights. I found this with some B&W shots I did recently of friends of mine at the beach (in Seattle). The day was quite bright, and I did a bad job at remembering to stop down the lens. ;) Scanning on the UMAX, the negs were nearly unusable (at least the sky portion); on the Epson, they were very good. Now, this is only my relative opinion, from only using a pretty bad (by today's standards) UMAX previously. I uploaded one of the raw images, straight in from the scanner (converted to TIFF in PhotoShop). I think I used the default auto-levels in the scanner software -- not something I usually do, but I find it's actually not so bad on this scanner. Note that this is an 8mb file, scanned at 800dpi at 16bits. I tried to make it a reasonably-sized JPEG, but doing so destroyed all the details that I'm talking about. But if you're truly interested, take a look: http://www.meer.net/~johnl/010717a.04.tif (I shouldn't have to mention that this is only for reference -- please don't do anything else with this file.) > Have you compared to any high-end scanner? I haven't. I'm considering splurging for an Imacon scan, but haven't yet gotten around to it. > Since you mentioned color negs (off topic here, but...) does the > interface have > profiles or transforms for different color neg films? Its idea of profiles seems a bit wacked -- seems to prefer to tag it with an *output* profile, rather than a scanner profile. On the other hand, the Pro model (and maybe a few of the other variations) comes with both SilverFast & Monaco EZcolor (and a printed IT-8 target). An acquaintance had reasonable luck making a scanner-based profile and applying that in PhotoShop (obviously turned off the tagging in the Epson scanner driver), and that worked well. I haven't yet tried it. john
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 1680
2001-08-09 by John Labovitz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.