--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote: > > > Hi Tyler. As far as I can tell softproofing with the LAB gray profile does > exactly the same thing as just assigning your file to the Lab gray space. Yes I would think so. The only difference is how the file is tagged, which matters little in a practicle sense with this workflow. > I've also found that the softproofs I made for one specific inkset (UT2 on 1270) > work surprisingly well for many other situations. I think B&W turns out to be > a lot easier to work with a fairly generic softproof. Since you are always linearizing to the same standard, and we are just seeing the device to LAB LUTs by using preserve color numbers, with nearly monochrome output, I think you are right. In fact, if one turned out significantly different, I'd be inclined to relinearize it. > I've been experimenting with a shortened Lab profile to reflect a typical dmin > and dmax, but there's a awful lot of combinations of Black Pt Comp, Ink Black, > Paper White and Intents. I guess you'd have to come up with some average, but it could be useful. There are ways to edit media white and ink K in profiles, but they have to be true icc profiles. I don't know how you are making yours, but if you've figured out a way to make true single channel icc profiles, I'll be even more impressed than I already am. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Soft proofing profiles for QTR (Win XP) ?
2005-01-07 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.