It was very popular in the early Seventies due mostly to the "look" which boiled down to the grain the incredibly long tonal scale. Many users rated it at 800 or even 400 to get the effect they were after...Kodak introduced a bunch of other "recording film" types with different numbers that were faster and much finer grain (not interesting looking)...the difference between "recording films" at 3200 and TriX at that speed is that the recording films had all sorts of latitude at that rating. The main use of these films was surveillance (sp?)....as you can imagine, that's a dead market these days. Photo hobbiests and pros used only a tiny percentage of what was produced. In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Michaels" <bob@b...> wrote: > > It came in a very industrial looking box, identified as "Kodak 2475 > Recording Film" with a suggested iso of 1000. But everyone pushed it. > You just had to believe it was much faster than TriX because of the > huge grain. > > Bob Michaels > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2475 Recording Film grain: how ?
2005-01-28 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.