Tariq- I totally agree with you about the Pictorico papers. I have contacted them and they have no plans at this time to offer larger rolls, either. I've heard that Lexjet semigloss is metamerism free and have ordered some to try it. I've also order some of the glossy and semi gloss from MOAB. The Kodak glossy pro doesn't cut it. I use Epson OEM UC ink and the best results for me right now are with Epson Premium Glossy, but I still yearn for a smoother surface. I'll send you an email if either of the two I've just ordered match the Pictorico results. cheers, Tom O'Connell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tariqgibranstudio" <Tariq@T...> wrote: > > > A few years ago when I first started using an Epson 2200, I did a test > of various Glossy papers and found that Pictorico Photo Glossy(not the > more expensive Gallery) gave the least amount of Matermerism AND also > gave me the closes thing to what I get from my air dried Glossy Fiber > B&W prints. I now use an Epson 9600 and, as far as I can tell, > Pictorico Glossy is not available in long roll sizes. Can anyone on > the list suggest either an exact replacement or the closest thing they > have discovered to Pictorico glossy which is available in Long > Rolls(44", 36"). Thanks and I very much enjoy the list - very kind, > helpful and knowledgeable members. > > Tariq
Message
Re: Pictorico Photo Glossy Long Roll Replacement?
2005-01-31 by Tom OConnell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.