If you use QTR metamerism is not an issue even with colour inks. For B&W tho I do think there is a lot to be gained from dedicated inks if and when you are ready. But as a first step for the original poster the MIS UC equivs represent a sensible economic move. > From: John Houghton <j.houghton@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:46:29 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Neutral B/W Prints Epson 2100 > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> Well for now stick with the colour inks - you can expand into other > ink sets >> as you get up to speed a bit more. Given you, like I, live in the > UK >> (assuming from your email address) you are probably wise to explore > MIS' >> equivalent inks to the Epson Ultrachromes. See here: >> >> http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/arcink_7600.html > > Steve, How do the MIS inks compare to the Epson UC inks in regard to > metamerism? I have Lyson Fotonic inks in a 1290, which are poor in > this respect. I don't want to make the same mistake again with the > 2100. > > John
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Neutral B/W Prints Epson 2100
2005-02-01 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.