Steve, >... I think there is potentially something to be said >for an "overcoat" rather than laying down glop "in the mix". >Worth exploring. Definitely, and its one of the things on the front burner. There appear to be advantages to both using Glop while printing and using it as an overcoat. Which approach is best may vary with the circumstances. Both should probably be easy to do in an optimum printer setup. There are a number of factors. Since I'm gallery sitting soon, I can just mention a couple that may affect the overcoat method: The glop is not totally transparent. It has some density. As such, the highlights will be dulled by it. In my curves I put very little if any glop in the highlights. I don't want the highlights dulled. I find that a curved that tailors the glop to the bronzing pattern allows me to deal with the highlight issues while still pouring glop on where the bronzing is worst. The ideal might be a perfectly registered overcoat, but that is not very realistic with these printers. Even a fuzzy mask is going to probably be hitting the spectral highlights. So ... I'm thinking flexibility of approach at this point. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Glop [was The MIS 7600 Archival Inkset]
2005-02-03 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.