On 3/7/05 12:37 PM, "Anthony G. Atkielski" sent the following verbage: > > Some people see a computer as a tool, others see a computer as an end in > itself. Those in the latter category often upgrade endlessly, since > they never actually do anything else with the machine and they are > mainly interested in twiddling with it. Your statement is nonsense. > Those in the former category > are better off never upgrading anything, since every upgrade > destabilizes a machine and risks bringing it down for hours or days, and > virtually no upgrades provide any useful or required new functionality. I guess they also don't cross the road to get to the other side. > > In general, the more a business or individual depends on its computer > for work and play, the less frequently that computer gets updated or > upgraded. Large production computer systems can be years behind the > times. Ditto, nonsense. If a press house isn't somewhat up to date I won't give them my business. Never have I come across a business that is any farther behind in upgrades to PS than one version. Equipment changes, software advances change things, and our work flows are better off for it... Carolyn
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography
2005-03-07 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.