John, > ... Why in the world if the > yellow channel is the PRIMARY ( though certainly not total) change in the > Epson pigment inkset from Archival CF to UltraChrome, is it not possible > to > just replace that yellow ink with theUltrachrome equivilent and, remake > profiles and the driver for everything, with much improved results. I think one of the primary changes between the Archival and UC inksets was the pigment load. The UC inks have, I believe, a higher load of pigment particles. By the way, in my initial fade tests of B&W inksets made with UC LK and UC or Archival color pigs added to neutralize the warmth of the LK, the UC performed better than the Archival. >...I am completely satisfied with the CF inks rendition of all colors > except > the ones such as yellow, red, and orange, where intensity is needed in > these > hues. This CF yellow also has much worse metamerism.The blues and > greens are just beautuful to me and so much nicer than anything we had to > work with in chemical color printing just as in Ultrachrome. Yea the > Magenta > may be a little weaker also but it is the yellow that is the big limitaion > of this > inkset for color control. I suspect you could just use the UC yellow and not do any harm to anything. >Of course the black component is different but that's a > different problem with different solutions. The archival K tests out just like the old MIS VM. I suspect it is a hybrid black. The UC MK and PK are much stronger. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Combining CF and Ultrachrome- What is actually in Ultrachrome inks?
2005-03-12 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.