It was actually a known flaw in the software, Nikon was trying hard to ignore it. About 2 years ago another list member (I believe Ernst Dinkle?) circulated a petition politely requesting they clean up their act; I guess if it's no longer neccessay with the 9000 they finally did something about it. Steve Karafyllakis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Graham" <gebilwil@n...> wrote: > This supposedly was important with the 8000 and is not necessary with the 9000. > > Haven't tried it though. > > Scott > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" <westsidemaurice@y...> > wrote: > > Thanks Steve.. > > > > It's "often suggested" but I never really believed it was true... I > > thought I was off into urban-scanning-mythologyland... > > > > Did Nikon mention it somewhere... or is this just a wonderful bit of > > Internet wisdom? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scanning B&W negs as pos is often suggested... helps with this > > > > image...any idea WHY this works, if in your experience it does?
Message
Re: scan B&W as neg...WHY?
2005-05-03 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.