Neil- There's always the PS Filters>Add Noise>Grain approach. I scan from Tri-X 35mm negatives so I don't need to do this and the 2400 prints look really excellent--better than anything I did on silver in 30+ years of darkroom work. Just my 2 cents. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "neilsphoto" <neilsphoto@y...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" > <cj@c...> wrote: > > Hello Walt, > > > > >>2400 definitely does not do BO. Can you believe this? > > > > >Why would you want to do black only when you have 1 black and > > >2 gray inks, not to mention light cyan,light magenta and > > >yellow for infinate toning if desired. Am I missing something? > > > > Yes. BO printing, especially using Eboni, has some unique qualities > > that a lot of people like very much > > > Exactly what Clayton said. The UT7 prints from my D70 files are too > smooth and too clean. I know that makes no sense to some people. > > I like grain, I like Rodinal. I like some kind of character. BO has > something. If I am going to be shooting more digital than I am TX > then I'd really want my printer to let me print BO if I wanted. > > Neil
Message
Re: 2200 says "no ink here" but there is - BO?
2005-06-30 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.