> From: Ken Carney > > This is not quite on point with the thread, but perhaps you can shed some > light. I recently did a project in CRW, converted to 16-bit tif. The > printer wanted me to do the CMYK conversion according to their > press specs, > which I did. The design consultant says the CMYK images have excess noise > when converted from 16-bit to 8-bit to lay out in Quark. I said > fine, I'll > convert the 16-bit RGB files to 8 and send to you, and you can have the > press do the CMYK conversion. I'll be there with match prints at > the press. > The design consultant indicates that any conversion from 16 to 8 > adds noise > and banding because an extra 1/2 bit of noise is introduced in the PS > conversion, and that for press work it is preferable to shoot in 8-bit jpg > initially. Well, there goes my custom white balance (WhiBal cards applied > to the same image in Capture One). I tried these conversions and on my > screen (OptiCal calibrated LCD) could see no differences of any kind. Do > you or others on the list by chance know if this is BS or if there is > something I'm missing? Thx for any help. Well, I don't see how shooting 8-bit JPEG in the first place could possibly help. 8-bit might cause posterization, but PS at least claims to have an option that adds dither noise when doing color space conversions in 8-bit mode, which should avoid posterization. I have no experience with CMYK, so I don't know if there are any special issues there. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: [Digital BW] jpg vs. raw
2005-07-05 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.