Digital BW, The Print

I think Roy may be travelling.  I will email you one off-list.


> From: Tom Moore <r.t.moore@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:27:37 -0400
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: QTR icc generation
> 
> Roy
> 
> Could you provide the format of the file expected by your ICC profile
> generator? Since it doesn't deal with hue, I might be able to create the
> required file using a combination of Excel and my x-rite 810.
> 
> Tom Moore
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roy
>> Harrington
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:23 PM
>> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: QTR icc generation
>> 
>> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody"
>> <moodymz3@y...> wrote:
>>> If someone already has i1 photo for profile creation does this new
>> feature
>>> produce icc profiles any differently, other than being grayscale only?
>>> 
>>> I thought I recalled Steve mention that this new feature would do
>> something
>>> that even ProfileMaker 5 can't do.  I don't quite understand what that
>> would
>>> be.
>>> 
>>> John
>> 
>> Essentially that's main difference -- its grayscale instead of RGB.
>> One big advantage of that is going from 3 dimensions to just 1.    The
>> typical
>> target sheet for RGB has about 200+ patches, but that works out to only
>> about 6x6x6 or 6 samples per dimension.  So 21 steps in one dimension
>> is a lot more accurate -- which is impractical in 3 dimensions.
>> 
>> Roy