Digital BW, The Print

Steve,

Could you send me the same file you're sending to Tom. I also use an 
x-rite 810

Your friend in Photography,

Johnny

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale 
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> I think Roy may be travelling.  I will email you one off-list.
> 
> 
> > From: Tom Moore <r.t.moore@r...>
> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:27:37 -0400
> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: QTR icc generation
> > 
> > Roy
> > 
> > Could you provide the format of the file expected by your ICC 
profile
> > generator? Since it doesn't deal with hue, I might be able to 
create the
> > required file using a combination of Excel and my x-rite 810.
> > 
> > Tom Moore
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Roy
> >> Harrington
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:23 PM
> >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> >> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: QTR icc generation
> >> 
> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody"
> >> <moodymz3@y...> wrote:
> >>> If someone already has i1 photo for profile creation does this 
new
> >> feature
> >>> produce icc profiles any differently, other than being 
grayscale only?
> >>> 
> >>> I thought I recalled Steve mention that this new feature would 
do
> >> something
> >>> that even ProfileMaker 5 can't do.  I don't quite understand 
what that
> >> would
> >>> be.
> >>> 
> >>> John
> >> 
> >> Essentially that's main difference -- its grayscale instead of 
RGB.
> >> One big advantage of that is going from 3 dimensions to just 
1.    The
> >> typical
> >> target sheet for RGB has about 200+ patches, but that works out 
to only
> >> about 6x6x6 or 6 samples per dimension.  So 21 steps in one 
dimension
> >> is a lot more accurate -- which is impractical in 3 dimensions.
> >> 
> >> Roy