How about just carbon based ink prints. Who cares how it is deposited or put down other than the person making the print? Addendums can describe process for those interested or "concerned". Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > I don't know. I don't see anything wrong with inkjet or digital inkjet output as a > description because there are many kinds of ink prints - including the still > produced photogravure reproduction. Also the word "ink" could mean > anything from poor quality offset inks, good quality offset inks, silkscreen > acrylic or oil based inks, very poor stability dye inks, or the finest carbon inks. > It seems to me the only thing the term ink does is to distingish it from color > coupler, dye bleach or other metalic based processes. ( although there are > metallic inks too). > > What is wrong with Carbon Based Inkjet Prints, like Carbon Based Lifeforms, > not completely carbon........ but what the hell.....
Message
Re: Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-26 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.