There are artist that pick up a camera and use it as another art form, such as some one like David Hockney. Or, someone such as Chuck Close who uses b&w photographs to use as a referance for his paintings. But I've yet to meet a photographer that has thrown away his camera and started using another media to create "art". Photographers are not artist. They're photographers. I don't like when someone refers to me as an artist. I've never wanted to be one. I've always wanted to be a photographer. That's what I am and that's what I want to be known as. My reply to Clayton regarding this matter was meant as a joke. No one should have taken it seriously. Long live photographers. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "koloshor" <wiz@n...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@y...> wrote: > > "Maybe I'll just quit this and take up drawing > > with a #2 pencil <g>." > > > > I thought the reason we become photographers is, because we CAN'T draw. > > There have been times in my life where the main purpose of my > photography was to capture images so that I could draw, paint, or > engrave them at my leisure. > > And being able to draw has always served me well. A quick sketch can > get you on the same page as an art director, in jig time.
Message
Re: Photographers can't draw
2005-08-16 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.