Cross-posting from another list: [regarding should you use 16 bit mode] "The simple answer would be yes. The bit depth is really just the amount of precision possible, analagous to the number of decimal points in a floating point number. If you apply a curve to a floating point number of say 0.12 with a factor of 1.001 and you are limited to two places output you still have an output of 0.12. Or, given the same constraints, if the curve calls for a factor of 1.035 you still get an output of 0.12 (rounded from 0.124) while if the curve applies a 1.040 factor to your input you get a jump to 0.13 (rounding from 0.125). For a simple single non-agressive curve it probably doesn't matter much, but if you do more agressive or multiple adjustments the round off adds up fast, so even when you start off with 8-bit image, converting to 16-bit for adjustments buys you something. That's why Adobe makes such a big deal about upping its 16-bit support. mark" --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Brown" <baffin@c...> wrote: > Could someone elaborate, on the advantages of using 16 bit conversions vs 8 > bit. > > My digital capture is done with a 20D in RAW (obviously). I use Raw Shooter > to convert, I prefer it over the converter in CS2. > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown
Message
Re: 8 bit vs 16 bit conversions
2005-08-18 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.