Hi; Scanning as color negative allows the software to do the reversal which for Nikon is a mistake: it is notorious for clipping and compressing the shadows in this situation. Try this: A)scan as positve, either color or grayscale B)during preview, use the master analog gain slider to center the data. C) Set black & white points a bit short of normal. This will give you a low contrast image when you reverse in PS, but it will preserve ALL the data. you can then re-adjust with levels and curve layers to get the image you want. Scan in 16-bit. Unless you have a very dense negative, you shouldn't need to multi-sample, most negs developed for wet-printing don't even come close to the dynamic range of that scanner. Hope this helps! Steve Karafyllakis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "wwodets" <odets@c...> wrote: > I am using a Nikon 5000 with the Nikon software for Tri-X and Plus-X > negatives. I find better results scanning for "color negative" and > scan at 16 bits, 8X (seems to reduce scanner noise), and neutral > settings on all the other controls. At 100% on screen (1:1) I see > small areas of posterization, especially in shadows, but also sometimes > in midtones. These areas do not seem visible in the prints or at lower > resolution on screen. This makes no sense to me. Any thoughts? Does > Tri-X, with that long, shallow toe, actually look like this? Scanner > settings? Could the monitor itself (Sony LCD, 5K, 2.2) be doing this? > Thanks.
Message
Re: Nikon 5000 scanner question . . .
2005-08-23 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.