2 cents more on this...I've been using a 1280 for over a year and a half, that I bought as a new/refurb from Epson....started off with pigment MIS "archival color" inkset, CIS, sponged carts, w/eboni in the K position. Have never run dye inks through it. Have had no major clogs at all, no problems with the CIS at all...just 1-3 cleaning cycles occasionally to clean out the K and M heads mainly, no big deal...prints perfectly after cleaning. Most of the time it doesn't need cleaning. And I don't use this printer more than once every week or two (mainly print B/O & sepia with it.) And I live at 7500' in desert dry conditions, but do have a humidifier turned on when the humidity drops below 50% inside. Just my experience, maybe I'm lucky, maybe it has everything to do with not running dye inks first. Another Epson I have that I DID run dye inks through at first, simply would not subsequently print MIS UT pigments, always clogged, so I gave up and switched back to dyes for that one (dye inks are ideal for digital negatives on Pictorico film, BTW)...Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Intrinsic Pictures <lists@i...> wrote: > I've loved my trial experience with my C84 and UT-EZ inks (well...at > least with the matte papers). Now I want to do the same in a larger > format. This seemed to point directly to the 1280, where I could branch > out a little into simple toning, or default to the sliders if I didn't > want to mess with it. > > Now I read (and recall reading previously over the years) all the > horror stories about the 1280, clogs from hell, dye printers maybe not > being the best for pigs, etc. I don't have the time or patience to > fiddle with a fussy printer every day. I'm a knowledgeable Photoshop > user, but would prefer a more intuitive solution than transfer curves. > > So is it still possible to get relatively painless 13x19-ish black & > white using the Epson driver and UT inks? In an ideal world, they'd > match the output from my C84 with EZ-N so I could continue to use and > sell both seamlessly. > > TIA, > Doug > www.IntrinsicPictures.com
Message
Re: So if not the 1280... relatively painless 13x19 for a C8x user?
2005-09-07 by m87507
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.