Digital BW, The Print

I expected the last bit to be rougher, but I see it on the first bit as
well.  I suppose the curved paper path is not the best thing for heavy
papers.  At normal viewing distances, it is hard to see.  Move in for a
close inspection and it jumps right out.

Best regards,
John Moody

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Paul Roark
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 8:42 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] r200 with QTR

John,

I have not had time to get back to the R200.  With the cheaper printers the
last 1" is rougher because the heads tend to be "vertical," such that they
are still printing after the paper is outside the main rollers.
<snip>

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
> Moody
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:53 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> Subject: [Digital BW] r200 with QTR
>
> The microweave pattern is not perfect, i.e. you can see that it was
> obviously printed by an inket printer.  The pattern degrades; more banded,
> within ~0.6 inches of the paper edge, making the "good" image area about
> 1"
> less in height than the paper.
>
> Best regards,
> John Moody
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]