I certainly agree and I wish you luck. You won't be the first who's requested as much from IJM. The other thing I told a gallery was that I'd bet my house that my prints would outlast the Mixed Media prints they had hanging and were selling for $700 ea. (about 11"x11"). These to my eye were an amalgam of offset press materials (wrapping papers I think), inkjet, acrylics, and of course, adhesives. I bet that artist wasn't even asked how long theirs would last... Todd > I feel so too Todd, and feel so based on this same chain of > reasoning. But while this persuades us, I don't think it's useful > promo. In fact, I'm afraid that some people's eyes would glaze over > and they would be reminded of the last car or computer sales person > who talked too fast about technicalities they didn't understand. > Especially if they heard from the Iris printer that actually the > paper in the 100-year test wasn't Hahnemuhle at all and was coated > with a different coating and here's a web site to prove it. We could > try to explain that away, if we got a chance, but once you get in a > position of having to explain things away, I think you've lost. So I > wouldn't say what you and Julian say, not because I don't believe > it's true, but because I think it's better to say too little than too > much. What I do think we should say to IJM (and other vendors) is > that we need test results at RIT or Wilhelm to which we can point. > > Sam > > >> I do as Julian does. Unfortunately I don't see independent tests for the >> carbon quads, but I take these factors into account and do the best I can >> with making something meaningful from them: >> >> Enhanced Generations on Hahnemuhle paper is at 100 Wilhelm years and >> counting, and they use a less stable black than the Piezo or MIS VM black. >> >> 100 W. years is longer than most color photographs are rated by W. >> >> I base my claim on using carbon pigments on H. papers. >> >> Color pigments are likely to be less stable than black carbon pigments, thus >> carbon quads are likely to last longer than color pigs, which already test >> longer than most color photographic materials (Perhaps dye transfer lasts >> longer). >> >> I know (know? well no I don't know) these prints won't last as long as >> silver BW prints because I'm told conditions which fade these guys >> appreciably don't budge silver prints. >> >> So all told I feel Julian is about right in a ball park sense. At least it >> shows it's in there among other collected mediums... >> >> Todd > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] print sales - longevity claims?
2001-12-19 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.