Digital BW, The Print

I have been told that museums will not touch mounted photos... and 
even though there are no museums looking to purchase my prints ;) my 
collectors are also somewhat aware of this and would prefer unmounted 
photos.

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody" 
<moodymz3@y...> wrote:
> The PMA-568 adhesive comes with a hard plastic squeegee, and I 
suspect many
> people don't really press it down thoroughly and completely, 
leading to
> future release.
> I use a rubber J roller, like what is used for laminating or 
veneering with
> contact cement.  I assure you it is very permanent after that, and 
_can't_
> be removed.
> 
> Best regards,
> John Moody
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
> photoian@c...
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:07 PM
> To: Group
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re:FAQ? HP 8750 vs Epson 2400 for B&W
> 
> My suggestion is to dry mount it; I do that with all my prints , 
inkjet and
> other and have never had a problem. There are psa systems but my 
experience
> is that they ultimately start to let go and billow up toward the 
glass.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> 
> Message: 3
>    Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:10:03 -0000
>    From: "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@y...>
> Subject: Re: FAQ? HP 8750 vs. Epson R2400 for B&W
> 
> ok, I was the one who mentioned HP Premium Plus Glossy puckering up 
and
> contacting the glass when hinged behind an 8-ply museum mat.  If a
> traditional archival hinged mat sandwich is the wrong way to mount 
this
> paper, what are you saying is the right way to do it?
> 
> mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]