--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Douglas meeuwsen <lipshurt@m...> wrote: > > what printer and what ink? 2200 with UT7 inkset >On the 2400, PSM works good with the PSG > setting, and looks nearly the same. There is a diferent kind of gloss > diff on the 2400. It's just a hair more obvious on the extreme > highlights than PSG Interesting - with the ink and profile combinations I'm using, the gloss differential on the PSM is less pronounced than on the PSG, but the areas with a faint gd are larger. In printing several of the same images, as close to optimal to my eye with profile / curve tweaks, etc., as I can get them, I'm coming to the conclusion that for my photo and printing style, PL = portrait, PSG = landscape and PSM = still life - although I'll obviously deviate from that if the image seems to fit it.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] No more (ok, very little) matte paper for me ... (was - Matte p
2005-10-14 by Doug Wolf