Sorry, meant to send this directly to Steve. Carl On Oct 21, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Carl Schofield wrote: > Steve, > > I seem to be getting results that are different from what you are > seeing. Below is a comparison of density and Lab-L, with and without > icc profile. Printed with 2400, MK, Hahnemuhle PR BW, using default > ABW neutral-darker settings and 2880 dpi (RPM). QTR gray lab working > space. Create-icc (2.3.2) used to make the icc profile form the new > step-wedge (10, 5, 1 % steps), but standard 21 step used for print > with the icc applied. Note that without the icc there is some > compression in the shadow region that is improved with the icc. > > Carl >  > On Oct 21, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Steve Kale wrote: > > >> I have posted a pdf file at the link below with the results of some >> QTR >> Create ICC tests I ran comparing a linearised QTR neutral curve mix >> (technically the individual curves were linearised not the mix) >> without an >> ICC profile, the same mix with an ICC profile generated by QTR >> Create ICC >> and the Epson driver with a colour GM Eye One Match generated ICC >> profile. >> The relevant file is called Colour Management Tests. >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/stevekale/stevekale2/FileSharing37.html >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
2005-10-21 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.