Digital BW, The Print

I am sending untagged raw data.  I agree Carl may find he is not sending the
file numbers he thinks he is if he has chosen to colour manage the step
wedge.


> From: Roy Harrington <roy@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:29:09 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
> 
> Steve and Carl,
> 
> I think this may be the very issue I mention in the last post.
> When you are printing with CM, it is VERY IMPORTANT to know what the
> embedded profile is.
> Carl says here Gray Lab but I think Steve is using GG 2.2 (not positive
> though)
> so they a supposed to get different results.
> 
> Roy
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
> <scho@m...> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Steve,
>> 
>> I seem to be getting results that are different from what you are
>> seeing.  Below is a comparison of density and Lab-L, with and without
>> icc profile.  Printed with 2400, MK, Hahnemuhle PR BW, using default
>> ABW neutral-darker settings and 2880 dpi (RPM).  QTR gray lab working
>> space.  Create-icc (2.3.2) used to make the icc profile form the new
>> step-wedge (10, 5, 1 % steps), but standard 21 step used for print
>> with the icc applied.  Note that without the icc there is some
>> compression in the shadow region that is improved with the icc.
>> 
>> Carl