Very strange, something has changed with the paper then, or the 2400 does some kind of magic. I've never seen a dmax that high from a pigment K on a coated fine art paper. Not questioning your result, just suprised. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote: > > Tyler, > > I had the same findings as Walt concerning VFA vs HPR dmax with the > 2400 and k3 MK ink. HPR about 1.64 and VFA 1.78, both using the VFA > media setting. I tried the other media choices but couldn't get any > higher with the HPR. This is using the Epson driver and ABW mode. > Probably need to do some fiddling with the driver controls or better > yet just use QTR for the Hahnemuhle papers. I haven't made any 2400 > QTR profiles yet for matte papers, so I don't know if a higher dmax > is possible. > > Carl > > On Oct 22, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Tyler Boley wrote: > > > Velvet Fine Art is simply rebranded Somerset. Though it is nice paper > > the Hahnemühle papers have always been able to get a higher dmax and > > ink load. In comparing Innova to Hahnemühle I would expect it to > > outperform Somerset as well. > > I'm not knocking Somerset, I've seen many nice prints on it, but > > something unusual must be going on with your tests. Perhaps there are > > other settings that would take better advantage of the other papers' > > capabilities. > > Somerset still has one of the nicest surfaces ever produced for our > > use. > > Tyler > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "wwodets" > > <odets@c...> wrote: > > > >> > >> A friend has just sent me an unmanaged 51-step gray file printed from > >> his 2400 and I compared it with the same target printed with my 2400. > >> Both targets were printed on Velvet Fine Art, ABW Neutral (Darker). > >> For the 90, 92, 94, 96, 98 and 100 steps the measured values are > >> shown > >> first for his printer and then in parentheses for my printer: > >> > >> 19.46 (19.38); 17.67 (17.60); 16.63 (16.41); 15.53 (15.48; 14.36 > >> (14.47); 13.84 (13.83). > >> > >> So, it seems to me that the consistency between these two > >> inexpensive, > >> uncalibrated printers is remarkable; and I would point out again that > >> the shadow separation, linearity and D-max of this paper seems much > >> better than anything else I have measured or than has been > >> discussed on > >> the forum over the past few days. My corresponding figures for > >> the HPR > >> (VFA paper setting) are: > >> > >> 18.39, 17.63, 17.14, 16.94, 16.69, 16.80. > >> > >> Walt > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > > ~--> > > Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your > > home page > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ucIolB/TM > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ~-> > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > > resources as they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > > visiting this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > > to keep them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > > from the membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > > removed from the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > > group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" > > in the Files section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL > > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Shadow separation and linearity . . .
2005-10-22 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.