I can't see any reason to use ImagePrint for B&W or Color. For color work, you can get better gamut and Dmax with the Epson driver and a custom profile, and for B&W, QTR, IJC/OPM or other solutions will give better output. IP doesn't allow any control over ink limits and lineatization. It is also expensive for what you get, and a license only covers usage with a single printer model. There are better, less expensive options out there. I'd definitely go with the 2400 if it was a choice between the two. Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert DeCandido, PhD" <rdcny@e...> wrote: > > Hello, > > If you had a choice bwtween purchasing a used 2200 w/ ImagePrint 5.6 (with a free upgrade to 6.0) for $450, or purchasing a new 2400, which would you choose? > > (The ImagePrint version is the Lite, and not full version. Lite retails for $495.) > > The Epson 2200 was purchased in 2003 and has received "moderate" use. > > Thanks for advice, > > rdc/nyc >
Message
Re: 2400 vs. 2200 w/ ImagePrint 5.6
2005-11-08 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.