The other day I tested the K3 x8xx printers by comparing an A4-size B&W print that I had made on my 7600 using ImagePrint 6 with a print made at a dealer on the 4800 using the Epson Driver in Advanced B&W mode. By way of background: I have been printing on Epson Premium Semi-Matte paper using PK inks because I want to get deeper blacks than is possible with MK on matte papers; but these prints have so much bronzing and gloss differential that they are acceptable only after being laminated with a glossy laminate, which eliminates these problems and also provides the additional benefit of making the blacks deep and rich, and gives increased saturation on color prints -- the prints are stunning after lamination. The purpose of the test was to see how the K3 inks compare with the Ultrachrome inks: the result is that, for the picture I used -- which had a good mount of black and almost-black areas and also some very strong bronzing and gloss differential problems on the Ultrachrome ink print -- the latter two problems were completely absent on the K3 print. Moreover, the blacks on the K3 print were slightly darker than on the Ultrachrome print, but this was not so obvious, as I had to look carefully at the prints next to each other to see this. The dealer made another print for me on the 4800 using the Advanced B&W mode, this time on a glossy paper (Tecco MediaWare): this print, again, had no bronzing or gloss differential and it looked stunning: just like the 7600 prints on Semi-Matte after they have been laminated. Now, from these two test prints on Semi-Matte, I could also see some differences between using the Epson Driver versus ImagePrint 6, but I hasten to state that this was not a proper test, which should be done by printing on the same printer. Nevertheless, the result was: 1. The print with the Epson Driver Advanced B&W mode had no color cast, and was similar to my Ultrachrome ImagePrint 6 print in terms of being neutral. 2. The Epson Driver for the K3 printers in Advanced B&W mode puts down a light-gray rectangle going out to the full paper size (A4 in this case), which was very visible in the the print the dealer made because the sheet of paper I used had been cut from a roll and was a little larger than A4 size, so that the light gray "border" around the image (which was a little less than A4 size) showed clearly against the white of the paper. Apparently the Epson puts down this light gray rectangle "under" the image as part of the way that it prints without a color cast. However, it means that the "paper white" is not a bright as the original paper, which is also true for the highlights in general: looking at the prints side-by-side, I could see that highlights in the ImagePrint were lighter (brighter) -- I'd say this is true all the way to the quarter tones -- meaning the the ImagePrint print has a larger dynamic range. To me this is an important consideration, and gives a strong advantage to ImagePrint. 3. The ImagePrint print has more shadow detail than the one made with the Epson Driver Advanced B&W mode. This is quite obvious and is true at least from the three-quarter tones to black, and and there is better differentiation in the blackest tones in the ImagePrint print. 4. Looking at the two prints with a 10x loupe I can see that the dither of ImagePrint is very obviously much better than that of the Epson Driver Advanced B&W mode, the latter looking like it lays down a "screen". However, looking at the prints with the naked eye the superiority of the ImagePrint dither was not obvious because the picture I used for the test is fairly high contrast and has only a few small areas of subtle tone transition, mainly in the quarter and mid-tones. Going by my general printing experience, I would think that in a picture that has a much larger proportion of its area with gradual and subtle tone transitions, the advantage of the better ImagePrint dither would be much more obvious and compelling. --Mitch/Bangkok
Message
Comparison: K3 versus Ultrachrome inks on Semi-Matte + ImagePrint
2005-11-17 by mitcha@mac.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.