Digital BW, The Print

Hi Michael,

I'm not quite up there with your knowledge, experience or 
expertise. ;-)  However I understand what Steve is trying to say and 
did not take his efforts to be an attack on any member of this 
forum.  He was explaining how GG2.2 distributes gray values.  Nothing 
more and nothing less.  I enjoyed his response and felt it was 
understandable, and I wait for Clayton to respond.  I am not my 
brother's keeper as you seem won't to be.  Sorry, I just wanted 
others to know that I did not see Steve's efforts as grandstanding or 
showing off as you seem to think it is.

Cheers,

Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Vendrell 
<mjvendrell2@y...> wrote:
>
> Steve Kale:  I can read Aristotle, Nuclear Physics,
> Isiac Newton and understand them - I even can do a bit
> of Calculus and use a densitometer and a step wedge -
> and a slide rule - if that betrays my age.  But I must
> admit I find your posts mostly unintelligible and
> completely unhelpful. Mostly your posts leave me at a
> loss and if misunderstood , you deserve most of the
> blame for that.
> 
> Clayton's, on the other hand, are enormously helpful
> toward achieving what I'm after- namely beautiful
> prints. 
> 
> If you want to be helpful - as opposed to
> demonstrating how "smart" you are - you would need to
> stop being insulting to others and tune up your
> communication skills.  There are quite a few
> scientists who can not only think clearly but
> communicate to other intelligent people in a way that
> is not insulting, makes sense, and is usable and
> helpful.  Maybe, you could take a few lessons from
> others such as Clayton, Paul, and Tyler...I can always
> hope...
> 
> Michael J. Vendrell
> 
> --- Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote:
> 
> > No Clayton you completely missed my point and a lack