Digital BW, The Print

Hello Michael,

>This is not "Rocket Scientology"...
>Clayton, thanks again for all your useful teaching as
>you share your knowledge gained empirically about what
>works for you to make pictures that look good to you. 
>And since you have also shared your images, and offer
>inexpensive samples - we have a profound sense for
>what your "looks good" means.

Thanks for your support and kind remarks.  Sometimes this list is very
frustrating.  As for GG2.2, please see my reply to Walt for the
details, but my approach has been to find the settings that initially
rendered an image as close to the final results as possible, so as to
require the least amount of manipulation.  I'm not against using GG2.2
settings with the 2400 if it can produce the same good results and
ease of workflow that the DG20 settings did with the older printers. 
The 2400's finer gamma choices may allow that so I'll be doing some
experiments with it.   

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm