Clayton, You're entirely welcome. I regret I resorted to a bit of "mud-slinging" in defense of my position - I suppose I just let the frustration of the condescension get to me. I'm sorry. I too appreciated Walt's clarification and read your response with interest and anticipation of your testing results. I have used DG-20 with BO printing on a 2200 and found like you that I had good control and WYSIWYG using such. With EZ on the C86 I used Paul Roark's recommendation of Gg2.2 and have been able to manage using such with that system. I don't as yet have a 2400, so can't add much to that discussion, although I await your testing to give me a starting point and save me a bit(of time,ink, and paper) before I begin my own testing. Ultimately we must all find what works best for ourselves - thank God we don't all make the same pictures or exhibit step-wedges! My next venture will be using the Piezo K7's in the 2200 with QTR - I'm anxious to begin as I have the inks - but my monitor has become erratic (a simple electrical connection problem I'm hoping) and must be repaired first - so I hope soon... Michael Vendrell --- Clayton Jones <cj@...> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > >This is not "Rocket Scientology"... > >Clayton, thanks again for all your useful teaching > as > >you share your knowledge gained empirically about > what > >works for you to make pictures that look good to > you. > >And since you have also shared your images, and > offer > >inexpensive samples - we have a profound sense for > >what your "looks good" means. > > Thanks for your support and kind remarks. Sometimes > this list is very > frustrating. As for GG2.2, please see my reply to > Walt for the > details, but my approach has been to find the > settings that initially > rendered an image as close to the final results as > possible, so as to > require the least amount of manipulation. I'm not > against using GG2.2 > settings with the 2400 if it can produce the same > good results and > ease of workflow that the DG20 settings did with the > older printers. > The 2400's finer gamma choices may allow that so > I'll be doing some > experiments with it. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Comparison: K3 versus Ultrachrome inks on Semi-Matte + ImagePri
2005-11-21 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.