Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Refilling 2200 carts vs CIS

2005-12-06 by Lotusm50

Hi Clayton-

I'm about to do the same thing.  I am lookign to test the K7 inl=ks on
a 2200 and in the past was using Piezo inks on a 1160 with the "no
more cart" CIS system inkject mall sold.  The CIS system was horrible
-- it clogged, it dripped, it had to be repaired a number of times, it
needed new carts, and then just didn't work right.  It was very
frustrating, and ultimately too costly.

I am very interested in the refillable, spongeless cartridge option as
it seems to be the perfect solutions for me -- Economic ink supply
without the hassle of a CIS, and I'm not using the printer so
intensively that refilling a cartridge now and then isn't much of an
inconvenience or disruption.

I'd be interested in knowing how you get on with your testing.  How
are the K7 inks on the 2200 compared to the Piezo ink (I used to use
the selenium tone inks set) on the 1160.  I'd also be interested in
knowing if you try the spongeless cartidges and what you thought of them

Thanks!

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Clayton Price 
> 
> Hi Clayton,
> Nice to meet you, CJ - it's a little freaky for me, since my middle 
> initial is also J :-)
> I'm just starting to test the K7 inks on my 2200, and in the past was 
> using Piezo inks in a CIS system with an 1160.  There's been some
> conflicting info whether the CIS  "spongeless" carts are behaving well. 
> So while I'll only use regular cartridges while testing this inkset,
> I know I'll want to switch to  CIS or refilling either the original K7 
> carts or finding some other refillable ones. Economics dictate such a 
> solution!
> I'm very interested in  the latest consensus what you and other's are 
> thinking.
> Thanks,
> 
> Clayton J (Price)
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.