OK - all this talk has finally made me look at digital more seriously - the thing is i really love B&W - and from what I understand about digital you need a good conversion and filter software, 'cause the digital images are in color. And then there is the cost. However, I did go over to B&H and look at some of the prices - I'm looking at Canon 'cause I have decent lenses - and don't wanna spend to get new sets of lenses. So, the cost for EOS 20D - body only - is about $1200 ---- Are there any reviews out there about this camera as used for B&W esp. nature photography, including trees, macro (flowers) , landscape? I know I'm asking for something quite specific, but for that price, and time I'd invest in learning it all... I really would like some more info. on how to evaluate the camera. At the same time it is certainly attractive that I would spend a lot less time, developing film, and then scanning 'em --- I could certainly take a lot more photographs, experiment more, print more.... so lotsa mores.... and features etc. tempting for sure... Altaf On Dec 10, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Clayton Jones wrote: > Hello Pete, > >> I would be interested to know if I am talking garbage -- I admit >> I have limited experience of the subject. I'll stick with film for >> now - > > No, you aren't talking garbage. Everything you listed is true, but as > you say, you are speaking with limited digital experience. Consider > this: the vast majority (probably in the high 90's %-wise) of film > photographers who try digital capture don't go back. There must be a > reason for that, in spite of all the things you mentioned. > > The hardest part of making the transition is accepting/realizing that > digital sensors are not an electrical version of film. I went through > a mourning period where I tried unsuccessfully to make my images look > like the Tri-X I loved for years. I finally understood that I was > dealing with a completely different medium, so I stopped trying to > make it be something else and began learning how to use it. What I > think all serious photographers have found is that there are > workarounds for the things you discussed. Film has certain advantages > over digital, but the reverse is also true. > > It isn't the same as film. Once you accept that, a whole new > wonderful world opens up. An analogy might be a painter who switches > from acrylic to oil, or vice-versa. This isn't meant to change your > mind. I think you should continue as you are. When the time is right > it will be compelling in its own unique way for you, and it won't be a > decision to be made. You'll just want to do it. > > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > ~--> > Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive today at Network for > Good! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/7zgKlB/dnQLAA/Zx0JAA/ucIolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Film vs Digital
2005-12-11 by Altaf Bhimji
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.