Digital BW, The Print

I'm no lawyer, but if this isn't the case, it damn well ought to be. 
Retailers will, however, give you a hard time if you admit to 3rd 
party inks, so don't. I have extensive experience at returning 
printers(9 so far, but none for any problem atributable to the inks) 
and I've been quizzed on this every time. My advice is, don't 
completely use up the initial set of OEM carts, so if you do have to 
retun the printer, you won't have to spend $60-100 on a set of carts.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "dlruckus" 
<dlruckus@y...> wrote:
>
> In the US this is incorrect. Epson or any other concern doing 
business
> cannot negate a warranty based on use of competing supplies. It is
> considered illegal restraint of trade. Instead they must prove in
> court that the supply directly causes harm and seek remedy against 
the
>  supplier, Not the consumer. That is not to say that one of their
> retail sources may not try to get away with it by assuming their
> customers won't know better.
> 
> Regards
> Duane
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "glemasurier"
> <george.lemasurier@m...> wrote:
> >
> > I went to a camera shop to buy a 2400, but their 
printing "expert"
> said some 
> > things that gave me pause; questions I'd like to pose here:
> 
> > 2. He had heard of people using MIS eboni instead of the MK, but
> warned that 
> > if the print head failed, the warranty would be voided. Has 
anyone
> had a print 
> > head fail? Wondering how often this happens and how others have 
handled 
> > (rationalized) this risk?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > George Le Masurier
> >
>