Yes, I think that's so--I have one of the original 1280's which is still going strong--and not too much problem with clogs, but I have not used pigmented inks (though I have considered for several years making it a dedicated b/w printer, but 'found' QTR instead). I have used a 2200 for several years with pigmented inks and have had virtually NO problems--with pigmented inks, but its meant to use them. Diane ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Karafyllakis To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 12:45 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: anyone thinking of buying an Epson 1280 photo printer...look here Hi Mark; I totally sympathize with you re the 1280. The original beige 1280 did much better, the fancier looking 1280s sucked. But in fairness to Epson, it was never intended to be run with pigment inks. As for HP and Canon, you'll have the same problem unless you buy one of the new 24" Canons that run pigments. It seems that of the current crop, the 2400 is the only reliable 13" printer worth owning if you want to print with pigment inks. Steve Karafyllakis [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: anyone thinking of buying an Epson 1280 photo printer...look here
2005-12-22 by Diane Fields
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.