new2jazz04 wrote: > Hello, > > This is my first post to the group. I just purchased the > Piezography K7 inkset for my 2200 and have been really pleased with > the results so far. I have read through the archives and haven't > really seen my question addressed directly. So, here goes: > > I have not had experience with the MIS ink systems and was > wondering whether someone could compare the relative pro's and con's > of that system to the K7 system. Please note, I am not asking for > a "which is best" review and don't want to start any sort of brand > warfare discussion. Since I don't have experience with the MIS inks, > I was just wanting a comparison. > > Thanks. > > Tim IMHO, it really comes down to whether you want a fixed tone inkset or a variable tone inkset. The main reason to use the UT7 set is that you can vary the tone to suit, within reason. The main disadvantage is the possibility of differential fading over time pushing the print's tone warmer or cooler than you intended. The K7 inkset has several advantages. The seven dilutions can give smoother tonal transitions than a four dilution set (the UT7 set is essentially two quadtone sets - a cool set and a warm set with a common black). Since the K7 set is a set of dilutions of a common black, tonality will be the same as the inks age. There should be no differential fading over time that will change the color of the print. You don't have to spend time and resources (test prints) picking a tone - the tone is fixed. Because the tone of the ink is fixed, you can vary the tone of the print by varying the tone of the paper. I'm sure if I missed any, others in the group will chime in ;-) Happy Holidays! -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography K7 vs. the rest
2005-12-26 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.