For color work I really like it. It's tough, even with Ultrachrome, doesn't transfer blacks in a book format, great gamut, and it is the sharpest coating I've ever used. It has no oba's and is 100% rag. For black and white I don't like it as much it looks a little cold with my neutral work regardless of the inkset. The only down side for color that I've experienced is its price, not cheap. But I consider it that best paper Epson has released under their name. john --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Nelson" <pnweb@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" > <deanwork2003@> wrote: > > > The Epson Ultrasmooth paper was made for the K2 inks. It > > doesn't scuff like that. > > Actually, how would Ultrasmooth be? (James Parker also suggested > this) I know the MFA in Boston uses it (and a 9600 with Ultrachrome > inks) for their reproductions and I've seen them and they look very > good. Luminous landscape gave it a good rating for dMax. What are > the downsides? I know it's a "natural" white, not a "bright" white, > but I don't think I'd miss the OBA's. Experiences? >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Choosing a paper-Legion Matte
2006-02-03 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.