"Part of me hopes that my 2100 will blow up so I have an excuse to get the 2400 as well." ROFL. Too funny...... Ginny PS-I wonder if someone could address my frequency of ink cart use question. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: > > > > > > From: ginnylady33 <ginnylady33@...> > > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:04:19 -0000 > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question > > > > Ah...OK Steve. Thanks for that info. In that case I'll go with the > > 2400. Especially after considering the weight and price of the 4800. > > With the 2400, would the improvement in B&W quality vs. the 1800 be > > out of the box or would I need 3rd party inks? > > Out of the box you will notice a huge improvement. (Yes the 4800 is a beast > and, as a pro printer, quite a bit more expensive.) > > > Also, if I am using it as a dedicated B&W printer and my 1800 for > > color, what would be the relative frequency of cartridge use for the > > 2400? For example, in doing color on the 1800 I tear thru Cyan and > > Magenta way faster than other colors. > > I can't speak for ink use but I would say that you'll likely use the 2400 > for colour as well (until you decide to replace the inks with dedicated B&W > ones). It is simply a better printer than the R1800. Part of me hopes that > my 2100 will blow up so I have an excuse to get the 2400 as well. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-04 by ginnylady33
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.