Hi Helens, In Spanish you are "tocayas", i.e you have the same name. I agree with you both. I have a 2200 and it is a great platform for tinkering in the 13" width - IF you ENJOY (as I believe I said in my original reply) experimenting with the process. For many of us this experimenting is an important part of our learning process - for others it is a distraction. The dollars or pounds "saved" by buying a used 2200 vs a new 2400 would in my experience soon be erased by the alternative ink sets, paper testing, RIP purchase, etc. So the 2400 would be much better "out of the box" whilst the 2200 would involve you in the process and be a great tool for learning - and in the end you would also have some great looking prints. In my darkroom days, I learned by and through the experimentation process and sometimes some very "creative" and pleasing (to me) images came out of my not knowing which rules not to break and chance "errors". For a similar experience you might be interested in the Nick Brandt images and interview in the "Lens Work" issue before last. In the digital "light room", I stumbled onto Black Only printing myself before coming to this group. (Since then I have benefittted greatly from learning how Clayton refined the process through his experiments.) If you believe the pop-up from the Epson driver - it is "not suitable for photographic printing." I hope to soon purchase an 2400 or X800 series and given my personality I probably won't be able to leave those alone either - although by all accounts they are very good if not excellent "out of the box." All this to say - what really matters is what really matters for YOU! All the best, Michael --- Helen Adams <helenadams@...> wrote: > Hi Helen, > > Thanks for your really kind offer. I had a look at > Ebay a few days ago and was not sure whether it > would be better to get a new cheap printer or a > second-hand more expensive one. I guess it is the > luck of the draw, as I couldn't see any that I would > have been happy buying, but I'll keep my eyes open > on this, as it is possible that a good printer at a > good price will come along. > > I'll email you off list about the printing as I > would be interested to see the quality. > > All the best - Helen > > > Hi Helen, > > I'm not sure how wise this piece of advice is, but > I'd seriously > consider buying a second-hand 2200 if you wanted > to start experiments > with B&W printing at a a comparatively low cost. > There are lots of > them on eBay. I'd be interested to hear the > group's opinion on this one. > > In the meantime, if you want some prints that the > judge might not turn > his nose up at, I'd be happy to print a couple of > your pictures as an > example of the 2200's capabilities. email me off > list if you want. > > Best, > Helen > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS Digital wedding photography Learn > digital photography Digital photography college > Digital photography Digital photography web > site Digital photography course > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > a.. Visit your group > "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web. > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to: > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Which Printer?
2006-02-13 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.