.. because a company is protecting its intellectual property? Coming up with a cartridge that does not require a valve in the print head is useful and non-obvious. If they have a patent on it, they should be protected for the term and scope of the patent; simple enoughÂ… and the courts will decide for those choosing not to settle. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of jeffrey sutton Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:11 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson files lawsuits against cartridge resellers <snip> Even though I have historically used Epson printers exclusively they are making hard for me not to look at their competitors with this practice. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Epson files lawsuits against cartridge resellers
2006-02-24 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.