There are already techniques for taking apart the original Epson carts and refilling them with whatever you want if one decides not to go the route of the cfs. I'm thinking more and more a really good cfs design is what we're headed for. The the whole issues of chips and carts becomes moot and Epson will still have to pay those attorney fees. Really cfs equals huge savings in the long run for all size machines.If I were a MIS engineer I would be putting my thoughts in that direction. A cfs system that reads the ink levels and possibly has a vacum that keeps air out of the lines. Now that would be sweet and we wouuld buy our ink by the gallons not by the mili-liter. At that point Epson would have to choice but to offer the finest ink in the world to keep up. John -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" <dfaprinting@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@> wrote: > > > > The bottom line for me is whether there are going to be good carts > available > > to us so that we can use the inks of our choice. Epson in their > press > > release claims to not be objecting to fair competition. So, can > they > > identify which carts are not violating their patents? If we ship > them some > > samples, will they tell us whether those carts violate patents or > not? > > > > Or will they (Epson) sell (for a reasonable price) empty carts? >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: epson lawsuit
2006-02-26 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.