Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Museo 2, 2400 basic settings question

2006-03-08 by John Moody

I would be concerned about increased microbanding, and general abuse to the
feed mechanism with that procedure.
Is manual feeding such a pain, that those concerns are outweighed, or do you
not see any microbanding difference in the output?

Best regards,
John Moody

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Clayton
Jones
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:20 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Museo 2, 2400 basic settings question

Howard,

>I'm following this thread with great interest. I, too, have
>'feed issues' with my 2400. It does appear to be very finicky
>with thicker papers.
>I recently tried H. Photo Rag 308. It was really hard to get this
>paper to feed correctly. I ultimately had to use the single sheet
>front feeder. And, even that, was not consistently effective.
> It is discouraging to have paid so much for a printer that has
>feed issues with thicker papers.

Please try the procedure I described.  Yes it's finicky, but using
this procedure I have essentially no problems and can feed it anything.

Regards,
Clayton





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.