Digital BW, The Print

Art,

Get the 220.  I have been using mine for about three months, with MIS 
inkset.  Stunning black and white, which is only what I use it for.  I never 
thought digital could equal darkroom.  Well, I was wrong.

I am considering another 220, one for color and one for black and white.  Or 
maybe one for glossy and one for matte, or maybe three.  At that price, I 
don't see how a person could go wrong, unless you need larger than 8.5x11.

Frank Vincent



>From: "Art" <aromanocpa@...>
>Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Digital BW] Epson 220
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:45:28 -0000
>
>Ok. I just wanted to say that I am very thankful that this web site
>is here and that you guys/gals are willing to help out so many
>people with their questions.  Thanks again.
>
>I've only just started with converting my darkroom to digital and
>you guys have been great.
>
>With that said, I have been reading past questions and I was shocked
>to see that one of the members (around March 21st ) was mentioning
>that the results of his BO prints from his 220 showed better results
>than the 2400 with its mulitple inks!
>
>I have been getting ready to go down and get the 2400 but now I am
>totally second guessing this.  IF the 220 gives 4x6 through 8x10 top
>quality why spend the extra money unless you are going over 8x10?
>
>Is this true? is the quality of the prints close to darkroom quality
>with a great workflow environment? WIth that in mind how are the
>color prints from the 220?
>
>PS is this only with the EBONI INKS for BO?
>
>
>Some please help.
>
>Art
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>