I've received a reply from Lee Dickinson of the NPS who wrote: BEGIN QUOTE > Sometime you work with an issue for so long that the simplest > statement becomes so obvious you don't make it. There are now > location fees for still photography permits in the National > Park Service, but the requirements for a permit have not > changed. Most still photographers in national parks will not > need to get a permit. > > Generally, a permit for still photography is needed only if > the activity uses models, sets, props, or requests access > into an area not open to the general public. END QUOTE It looks like we have nothing to worry about in this case. Rob Greer http://www.robgreer.com/ Altaf Bhimji <altafb@...> wrote: > > anyone here know anything about this? > > ------------- > Found this blog, which says that basically the NPS will start > charging photographers for > "commercial still photography". > > http://wcinews.blogspot.com/2006/04/national-park-service-issues- new- > rules.html > > Just an FYI, since it is possible that some members of these groups > could be affected. > If you have an opinion about this, contact the NPS chief (link in the > blog above), and also > your Congresscritter.
Message
Re: (off topic) photography rule changes at National Parks...
2006-05-03 by Rob Greer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.