Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Eboni in the UK

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Eboni in the UK

2006-05-02 by Brian

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Chris Ellis" 
Hi Brian

I'm based in the UK and order mine from MIS.  I have only used their
cheapest shipping option which typically takes 1-2 weeks.

(I've heard that the monochrome ink sold by Permajet is rebranded MIS
ink.  It works out cheaper to order it direct though.)


Thanks, Chris.

Brian

(off topic) photography rule changes at National Parks...

2006-05-03 by Altaf Bhimji

anyone here know anything about this?

-------------
Found this blog, which says that basically the NPS will start  
charging photographers for
"commercial still photography".

http://wcinews.blogspot.com/2006/04/national-park-service-issues-new- 
rules.html

Just an FYI, since it is possible that some members of these groups  
could be affected.
If you have an opinion about this, contact the NPS chief (link in the  
blog above), and also
your Congresscritter.

Ajay
-------------------

Re: (off topic) photography rule changes at National Parks...

2006-05-03 by Rob Greer

I've received a reply from Lee Dickinson of the NPS who wrote:

BEGIN QUOTE

> Sometime you work with an issue for so long that the simplest 
> statement becomes so obvious you don't make it. There are now 
> location fees for still photography permits in the National 
> Park Service, but the requirements for a permit have not 
> changed. Most still photographers in national parks will not 
> need to get a permit.
> 
> Generally, a permit for still photography is needed only if 
> the activity uses models, sets, props, or requests access 
> into an area not open to the general public.

END QUOTE

It looks like we have nothing to worry about in this case.

Rob Greer
http://www.robgreer.com/

Altaf Bhimji <altafb@...> wrote:
>
> anyone here know anything about this?
> 
> -------------
> Found this blog, which says that basically the NPS will start  
> charging photographers for
> "commercial still photography".
> 
> http://wcinews.blogspot.com/2006/04/national-park-service-issues-
new- 
> rules.html
> 
> Just an FYI, since it is possible that some members of these 
groups  
> could be affected.
> If you have an opinion about this, contact the NPS chief (link in 
the  
> blog above), and also
> your Congresscritter.

Re: (off topic) photography rule changes at National Parks...

2006-05-04 by koloshor

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Greer"
<digitalblackandwhitetheprint@...> wrote:
>
> I've received a reply from Lee Dickinson of the NPS who wrote:
> 
> > Generally, a permit for still photography is needed only if 
> > the activity uses models, sets, props, or requests access 
> > into an area not open to the general public.
> 
> END QUOTE
> 
> It looks like we have nothing to worry about in this case.
 
Dang. Most of my photography (even in parks) involves models...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.