I've received a reply from Lee Dickinson of the NPS who wrote:
BEGIN QUOTE
> Sometime you work with an issue for so long that the simplest
> statement becomes so obvious you don't make it. There are now
> location fees for still photography permits in the National
> Park Service, but the requirements for a permit have not
> changed. Most still photographers in national parks will not
> need to get a permit.
>
> Generally, a permit for still photography is needed only if
> the activity uses models, sets, props, or requests access
> into an area not open to the general public.
END QUOTE
It looks like we have nothing to worry about in this case.
Rob Greer
http://www.robgreer.com/
Altaf Bhimji <altafb@...> wrote:
>
> anyone here know anything about this?
>
> -------------
> Found this blog, which says that basically the NPS will start
> charging photographers for
> "commercial still photography".
>
> http://wcinews.blogspot.com/2006/04/national-park-service-issues-
new-
> rules.html
>
> Just an FYI, since it is possible that some members of these
groups
> could be affected.
> If you have an opinion about this, contact the NPS chief (link in
the
> blog above), and also
> your Congresscritter.