I'd be interested in hearing just how much more archival -- if they are indeed more archival -- papers like CSR and Innova F-Type Gloss are than a paper like Graphica Lustre. If there is not much of a difference in archivality, then is the sizable difference in the price of these "glam" papers warranted by a proportionate difference in print quality, surface texture, and overall feel of the paper? Chris Hargens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Karafyllakis" <stevekphoto@...> wrote: > BTW-if you get tired of mucking about with these new overpriced-glam > papers: What I've gone to now is the Oriental Graphica Lustre. Nice > surface, though not as nice as the Sihl Iridium, but clean glowing > highlights and a d-max of 2.35-2.4. For this particular paper it > doesn't seem to matter if its Epson or MIS ink; A greyscale done on > Clayton's R2400 gave me virtually identical dmax as one done on my > R1800 with MIS inks. Now if I could just find a mat board to match > the whiter base.... > > Best, > > Steve Karafyllakis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] K3 Ink in a 4000/Question for Shilesh Jani
2006-07-12 by tzinzunzan2006
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.